|
 |
Darren New wrote:
>> [Assuming it does all this through the OS. The Big Problem the Amiga
>> had is that since the hardware is "always" the same, a lot of software
>> bypasses the OS. Obviously this breaks horribly when the hardware
>> changes...]
>
> Yep. On the other hand, the original Amiga books described how to frob
> the hardware.
>
> Note that Windows supports DOS programs that bypass the OS in exactly
> the same way, and it WORKS.
The PC has the hardware necessary to do this with sane performance
levels. The Amiga didn't.
>> So Windows is designed to do a bunch of unecessary stuff in the
>> background by default. I consider this a design flaw. What *useful*
>> stuff does Windows do that AmigaDOS doesn't?
>
> It depends who you are. Aren't you the one complaining about lack of USB
> support in your NT machines?
OK, so USB support goes into the list of useful things Windows can do
that AmigaDOS can't.
>> If there were anything I could do to find out, I'd do it.
>> Unfortunately, there isn't.
>
> There's lots you can do. You just don't know how. That's why they give
> you the stack dump and such. "Wow, if only I could read a core file,
> I'd be able to tell which program is dumping core!" :-)
Only hyper-nerds are going to be able to get anything remotely useful
out of a dump file. To everybody else, it's just wasted disk space.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
 |